Why doesn’t London build more Lidos?

The Case for Expanding Lido Infrastructure in London

Recent reports of altercations at Parliament Hill Lido have cast a spotlight on the enduring popularity and sometimes challenging dynamics of London’s public swimming facilities. This situation prompts a broader question: Why doesn’t the city build more lidos?

While the demand for outdoor swimming options appears high—queues stretching around the block and wait times reportedly reaching two hours—it’s worth considering whether the barriers to establishing more of these facilities are primarily logistical or procedural. Interestingly, creating a lido is relatively straightforward, especially compared to the complexities of permanent infrastructure projects.

Reimagining the Concept of a Lido

A lido, at its core, is quite a simple construct: often a sizable, open-air pool filled with water, equipped with basic amenities such as showers and toilets. It does not necessarily need to be a permanent fixture; temporary setups could serve the community’s needs during peak seasons or heatwaves.

Given that the fundamental requirements are minimal—just a water-filled basin, sanitation facilities, and suitable safety measures—there’s significant potential for agility in their deployment. The key challenge lies in strategic siting and resource allocation.

Potential Locations in London

A notable example within London is Wimbledon Park. The park’s existing natural barriers could effectively control access, reducing issues related to overcrowding and security. Additionally, existing amenities such as a café and plumbing infrastructure simplify the logistics. With the recent expansion of the Wimbledon AELTC (All England Lawn Tennis Club), the park has become a versatile recreational hub that could accommodate a temporary water recreation facility during heatwaves.

A feasible approach would involve deploying a large, temporary swimming tub—say, 70 meters by 100 meters—enough to accommodate numerous swimmers comfortably. Basic installation processes, such as excavation with a backhoe, followed by filling the basin with water and appropriate chemical treatments, could transform this space quickly. The area’s size is sufficient to support this without significant disruption.

Benefits of Temporary Lidos

Introducing temporary or semi-permanent lidos brings multiple advantages:

  • Reduced Congregation Conflicts: Short-term setups could help distribute crowds more evenly across available sites, alleviating issues like overcrowding and altercations.
  • Community Satisfaction: As these facilities could be classified as temporary installations, local residents might be more receptive, viewing them as seasonal enhancements.
  • Cost-Effective Recreation: With a fee of approximately £25 per person, these temporary lidos could indeed pay for themselves, providing affordable access to outdoor swimming.

Practical Considerations

While the idea is appealing in theory, real-world execution involves logistical challenges. For instance, ensuring safety with lifeguard coverage and maintenance is essential, especially for open water or large-scale temporary pools. Moreover, some suggest utilizing existing bodies of water—such as sections of the nearby lakes—for open water swimming, provided suitable infrastructure, safety protocols, and access controls are implemented.

Moving Forward

To truly capitalize on London’s potential for outdoor swimming, strategic planning and investment are vital. This could involve committees like the Wimbledon AELTC or city councils prioritizing redevelopment projects that facilitate open water swimming or temporary pool installations.

In conclusion, expanding lido access in London is not only feasible but could significantly enhance local recreation, especially during heatwaves. Simple, low-cost, and temporary solutions can deliver immediate relief and long-term benefits, fostering a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient urban community.


Note: The idea of reimagining existing lakes or water bodies as swimming venues would require careful safety planning and staffing, but it remains a compelling option worth exploring.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *