Sensationalism in Media: A Strategy for More Eyeballs?
In today’s fast-paced media landscape, it’s not uncommon to encounter questionable editorial decisions seemingly designed to captivate audiences. But how far is too far when it comes to gaining viewer traction?
Recently, a controversial decision by a media outlet has sparked debates, raising concerns about the ethical lines being crossed for viewership. The outlet, in an attempt to generate buzz, chose to feature an individual with a criminal background—someone notorious for heinous acts—with their accolades still prominently displayed. This individual was even bestowed with an honorific title reminiscent of a revered warrior, which for many, seemed absurdly out of place.
Such choices beg the question: Is this a strategic ploy to escalate engagement and stir public interest by courting controversy? Or, are these editorial tactics simply ill-conceived attempts at appealing to a wider audience? As sensationalism increasingly permeates media, it’s crucial for consumers to remain critical of the narratives they are presented—ensuring that they don’t unintentionally contribute to the glorification of unacceptable figures under the guise of entertainment.